4.6 Article

Specific expression of Cre recombinase in hypertrophic cartilage under the control of a BAC-Col10a1 promoter

期刊

MATRIX BIOLOGY
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 693-699

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2008.07.001

关键词

Collagen X; Hypertrophic cartilage; Bacterial Artificial Chromosome; Transgenic mouse; Cre-recombinase

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [MA534/23-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previously we have shown that insertion of a LacZ reporter gene into the Col10a1 gene in the context of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) drives strong and specific expression of LacZ in hypertrophic cartilage of transgenic mice [Gebhard S., Hattori T, Bauer E., Bosl M.R., Schlund B., Poschl E., Adam N., de Crombrugghe B., von der Mark K., 2007 Histochem. Cell Biol. 19 127:183-194]. BAC constructs in transgenic reporter mouse lines control efficient and specific LacZ expression in hypertrophic chondrocytes under the complete Col10a1 promoter. Here we report on the generation of Col10a1-specific Cre deleter mice using a BAC recombineering technique based on homologous recombination in E. coli. Sixteen BAC-Col10-Cre transgenic lines were generated containing between I and 5 copies of the BAC-Col10-Cre gene. All lines tested so far expressed Cre specifically in hypertrophic chondrocytes of E16.5 and PI growth plates of long bones, ribs, vertebrae and sternum as examined by crossing with ROSA26 reporter mice. Cre activity was detected as early as E13.5 when hypertrophic cartilage develops in the diaphysis of femur and humerus. The data confirm that expression of Cre under the control of the complete BAC-Col10a1 promoter occurs with high efficiency and specificity in hypertrophic chondrocytes. The BAC-Col10-Cre lines should thus provide a Valuable tool to get further insight into the role of genes involved in endochondral ossification by allowing their specific deletion in the hypertrophic zone of the growth plate. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据