3.9 Article

Cost-utility analysis of methylphenidate treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD in Brazil

期刊

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 30-38

出版社

ASSOC BRASILEIRA PSIQUIATRIA
DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2014-1516

关键词

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; cost-utility analysis; methylphenidate

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (Edital MCT/CNPq/CT-Saude/MS/SCTIE/DECIT) [067/2009]
  3. Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA)
  4. Porto Alegre, Brazil
  5. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  6. Institute de Avaliacao de Tecnologia em Sande (IATS)
  7. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To perform a cost-utility analysis on the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with methylphenidate immediate-release (MPH-1R) in children and adolescents from Brazil. Method: A Markov model was constructed to compare MPH-1R vs. no treatment. A 24 -week naturalistic study was conducted to collect transition probabilities and utility data. Effectiveness was expressed as quality -adjusted life -years (QALY), and costs reported in 2014 international dollars (1$). The perspective was the Brazilian Unified Health System as payer, and the time horizon was 6 years. Results: Of 171 patients, 73 provided information at baseline, and 56 at week 24. Considering the MPH-1R monthly cost of 1$ 38, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of treatment was 1$ 9,103/QALY for children and 1$ 11,883/QALY for adolescents. In two-way sensitivity analysis, considering one Gross National Product per capita (1$ 11,530) as willingness-to-pay,a cost of no-treatment lower than 1$ 45/month would render MPH-IR a cost-saving strategy. Discussion: MPH-1R treatment of children and adolescents is cost-effective for ADHD patients from the Brazilian public health system perspective. Both patients and the healthcare system might benefit from such a strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据