4.7 Article

Tartaric acid assisted hydrothermal synthesis of different flower-like ZnO hierarchical architectures with tunable optical and oxygen vacancy-induced photocatalytic properties

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 357, 期 -, 页码 516-529

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.031

关键词

ZnO hierarchical architectures; Hydrothermal synthesis; Flower-like; Optical property; Photocatalytic performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50963003]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20132BAB206033]
  3. Foundation of Jiangxi Educational Commission [GJJ14558, KJLD13070]
  4. Project of Jiangxi Youth Scientist [20122BCB23031]
  5. Science Foundation of Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University [2014QNBJRC005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different flower-like ZnO hierarchical architectures were prepared by tartaric acid assisted hydrothermal synthesis, especially four flower-like ZnO nanostructures were obtained simultaneously under the same reaction condition. The cauliflower-like ZnO is assembled by spherical shaped nanoparticles, and the chrysanthemum-like and other flower-like ZnO nanostructures are assembled by hexagonal rods/prisms with from planar to semi-pyramid, and to pyramid tips. TA acts as a capping agent and structure-directing agent during the synthesis. All ZnO possess the hexagonal wurtzite structure. The PL spectra can be tuned by changing TA concentration. XRD, PL and Raman spectra confirmed that oxygen vacancies mainly come from the ZnO surface. The flower-like samples of 1:4.5 and 1:3 with the largest aspect ratios have highest photocatalytic performance. They decompose 85% MB within 60 min. Combining PL Gaussian fitting with K, the higher content of oxygen vacancy is, the higher photocatalytic activity is. The enhanced photocatalytic performance is mainly induced by oxygen vacancy of ZnO. The possible formation mechanism, growth and change process of flower-like ZnO were proposed. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据