4.5 Review

Microaeration for hydrogen sulfide removal during anaerobic treatment: a review

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11157-015-9386-2

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Elemental sulfur; Hydrogen sulfide removal; Microaeration; Sulfide oxidizing bacteria

资金

  1. specific university research (MSMT) [20/2015]
  2. International Research Staff Exchange Scheme project Renewable energy production through microalgae cultivation: Closing material cycles-ALGAENET [PIRSES-GA-2011-295165]
  3. Technology Agency of Czech Republic [TA03021413]
  4. Ghent University [BOF-01SF2012]
  5. CRHIAM Centre [CONICYT/FONDAP/15130015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High sulfide concentrations in biogas are a major problem associated with the anaerobic treatment of sulfate-rich substrates. It causes the corrosion of concrete and steel, compromises the functions of cogeneration units, produces the emissions of unpleasant odors, and is toxic to humans. Microaeration, i.e. the dosing of small amounts of air (oxygen) into an anaerobic digester, is a highly efficient, simple and economically feasible technique for hydrogen sulfide removal from biogas. Due to microaeration, sulfide is oxidized to elemental sulfur by the action of sulfide oxidizing bacteria. This process takes place directly in the digester. This paper reviews the most important aspects and recent developments of microaeration technology. It describes the basic principles (microbiology, chemistry) of microaeration and the key technological factors influencing microaeration. Other aspects such as process economy, mathematical modelling and control strategies are discussed as well. Besides its advantages, the limitations of microaeration such as partial oxidation of soluble substrate, clogging the walls and pipes with elemental sulfur or toxicity to methanogens are pointed out as well. An integrated mathematical model describing microaeration has not been developed so far and remains an important research gap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据