4.5 Article

Theoretical consideration of selective enrichment in in vitro selection: Optimal concentration of target molecules

期刊

MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES
卷 240, 期 2, 页码 201-211

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.07.006

关键词

SELEX; Biopanning; In vitro evolution; Selection pressure; Evolutionary design; Directed evolution

资金

  1. MEXT, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We considered an in vitro selection system composed of a peptide-ligand library and a single target protein receptor, and examined effective strategies to realize maximum efficiency in selection. In the system, a ligand molecule with sequence s binds to a target receptor with probability of [R]/(K-ds + [R]) (specific binding) or binds to non-target materials with probability of q (non-specific binding), where [R] and K-ds represent the free target-receptor concentration at equilibrium and dissociation constant K-d of the ligand sequence s with the receptor, respectively. Focusing on the fittest sequence with the highest affinity (represented by K-d1 equivalent to min{K-ds vertical bar s = 1, 2, ... , M)) in the ligand library with a library size N and diversity M. we examined how the target concentration [R] should be set in each round to realize the maximum enrichment of the fittest sequence. In conclusion, when N >> M (that realizes a deterministic process), it is jiesirable to adopt [R] = K-d1, and when N = M (that realizes a stochastic process), [R] = root K-d1(K-d(-1))(-1)q rig only in the first round (where (*) represents the population average) and [R] = K-d1 in the subsequent rounds. Based on this strategy, the mole fraction of the fittest increases by (2q)(-r) times after the rth round. With realistic parameters, we calculated several quantities such as the optimal [R] values and number of rounds needed. These values were quite reasonable and consistent with observations, suggesting the validity of our theory. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据