4.4 Article

The associations between feeding difficulties and behaviours and dietary patterns at 2 years of age: the ALSPAC cohort

期刊

MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 533-542

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00399.x

关键词

dietary patterns; PCA; ALSPAC; toddlers

资金

  1. Arthritic Association
  2. Medical Research Council [G9815508] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little is known about the dietary patterns of toddlers. This period of life is important for forming good dietary habits later in life. Using dietary data collected via food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) at 2 years of age, we examined the dietary patterns of children from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Principal component analysis was performed for 9599 children and three patterns were extracted: family foods' associated with traditional British family foods such as meat, fish, puddings, potatoes and vegetables; sweet and easy' associated with foods high in sugar (sweets, chocolate, fizzy drinks, flavoured milks) and foods requiring little preparation (crisps, potatoes, baked beans, peas, soup); health conscious' associated with fruit, vegetables, eggs, nuts and juices. We found clear associations between dietary pattern scores and socio-demographic variables, with maternal education being the most important. Higher levels of education were associated with higher scores on both the family foods' and the health conscious' patterns, and decreased scores on the sweet and easy' pattern. Relationships were evident between dietary pattern scores and various feeding difficulties and behaviours. Notably, children who were introduced late to lumpy (chewy) solids (after 9 months) scored lower on both the family foods' and the health conscious' patterns. Further analyses are required to determine the temporal relationship between perceived feeding difficulties and behaviours, and it will be important to assess the contribution of the age of introduction to lumpy solids to these relationships.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据