4.7 Article

Effect of chemical heterogeneity on photoluminescence of graphite oxide treated with S-/N-containing modifiers

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 332, 期 -, 页码 272-280

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.114

关键词

Graphite oxide; Surface functional groups; Chemical heterogeneity

资金

  1. ARO (Army Research Office) [W911NF-10-1-0030, W911NF-13-1-0225]
  2. NSF [1133112]
  3. FEDER
  4. [CTQ2012-37925-CO3-03]
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1133112] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphite oxide (GO) obtained using Hummers method was modified by hydrothermal treatment either with sulfanilic acid or polystyrene (3-ammonium) sulfonate at 100 degrees C or 85 degrees C, respectively. Both modifiers contain sulfur in the oxidized forms and nitrogen in the reduced forms. The materials were characterized using FTIR, XPS, thermal analysis, potentiometric titration and SEM. Their photoluminescent properties and their alteration with an addition of Ag+ were also measured. As a result of these modifications nitrogen was introduced to the graphene layers as amines, imides, amides, and sulfur as sulfones and sulfonic acids. Moreover, the presence of polyaniline was detected. This significantly affected the polarity, acid-base character, and conductivity of the materials. Apparently carboxylic groups of GO were involved in the surface reactions. The modified GOs lost their layered structure and the modifications resulted in the high degree of structural and chemical heterogeneity. Photoluminescence in visible light was recorded and linked to the presence of heteroatoms. For the polystyrene (3-ammonium) sulfonate modified sample addition of Ag' quenched the photoluminescence at low wavelength showing sensitivity as a possible optical detector. No apparent effect was found for the sulfanilic acid modified sample. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据