4.8 Article

Fabrication of soft, stimulus-responsive structures with sub-micron resolution via two-photon polymerization of poly(ionic liquid)s

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 807-816

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.07.017

关键词

-

资金

  1. Marie Curie Initial Training Network - EC FP7 People Programme OrgBIO (Marie Curie ITN) [GA607896]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under the Insight Centre for Data Analytics initiative [SFI/12/RC/2289]
  3. Nano Research Facility in Dublin City University
  4. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  5. European Union Structural Funds Programme
  6. ARC Australian Research Fellowship
  7. ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science (ACES) [CE 140100012]
  8. University of Wollongong (UOW)
  9. EPSRC [EP/L014149/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soft, stimulus-responsive 3D structures created from crosslinked poly(ionic liquid)s (PILs) have been fabricated at unprecedented sub-micron resolution by direct laser writing (DLW). These structures absorb considerable quantities of solvent (e.g., water, alcohol, and acetone) to produce PIL hydrogels that exhibit stimulus-responsive behavior. Due to their flexibility and soft, responsive nature, these structures are much more akin to biological systems than the conventional, highly crosslinked, rigid structures typically produced using 2-photon polymerization (2-PP). These PIL gels expand/contract due to solvent uptake/release, and, by exploiting inherited properties of the ionic liquid monomer (ILM), thermo-responsive gels that exhibit reversible area change (30 +/- 3%, n = 40) when the temperature is raised from 20 degrees C to 70 degrees C can be created. The effect is very rapid, with the response indistinguishable from the microcontroller heating rate of 7.4 degrees C s(-1). The presence of an endoskeletonlike framework within these structures influences movement arising from expansion/contraction and assists the retention of structural integrity during actuation cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据