4.7 Article

Controlled fabrication and enhanced photocatalystic performance of BiVO4@CeO2 hollow microspheres for the visible-light-driven degradation of rhodamine B

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 349, 期 -, 页码 529-537

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.195

关键词

Microspheres; Degradation; Photocatalysis; Preparation; m-BiVai@CeO2 hollow microspheres

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11074312, 11374377, 11474174, A040105]
  2. Undergraduate Innovative Test Program of China [GCCX2013110004, GCCX2014110010]
  3. Undergraduate Research Training Program of Minzu University of China [URTP2013110039, URTP2014110038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

m-BiVO4@CeO2 hollow microspheres have been fabricated by a facile low-temperature co-precipitation method and subsequent annealing process. The composition, morphology and size of the as-fabricated m-BiVO4@CeO2 hollow microspheres were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The vibrational features and the electronic state of the as-obtained m-BiVO4@CeO2 hollow microspheres were studied by Raman spectra and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Band-gap energy of the as-prepared m-BiVO4@CeO2 hollow microspheres was evaluated by UV-vis spectrum. The visible-light-driven photocatalystic performances were evaluated by degradation for RhB dye molecules, demonstrating that the as-fabricated m-BiVO4@CeO2 hollow microspheres exhibit the enhanced photocatalystic activity, compared to the obtained pure m-BiVO4 microspheres. The separation of photoinduced electron-hole pairs and transfer between CeO2 and BiVO4 has been discussed in detail, in order to have in-depth understanding on the enhanced photocatalytic performance. The results indicate that the enhanced photocatalystic activity of the as-fabricated m-BiVO4@CeO2 hollow microspheres is attributed to the efficient separation of the photoexcited electrons and holes. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据