4.4 Article

PLASMA CONCENTRATIONS OF VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR IN RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY AFTER INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB INJECTION

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000535

关键词

-

资金

  1. Kosin University College of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To investigate the changes in plasma concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), insulin growth factor (IGF-1), erythropoietin, pigment epithelium-derived factor, and IgG1 after bevacizumab intravitreal injection in infants with retinopathy of prematurity. Methods: Eleven eyes from six infants who received intravitreal injection of bevacizumab were enrolled in this study. At preinjection and postinjection 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 weeks, 0.5 mL of blood was collected from each infant. The plasma concentrations of VEGF, insulin growth factor, erythropoietin, pigment epithelium-derived factor, and IgG1 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Five patients received simultaneous bilateral bevacizumab injection; one patient received unilateral injection. Results: Of the infants who received intravitreal bevacizumab injection, two were males and four were females. The mean gestational age was 26 +/- 2 weeks. The mean birth weight was 870 g. The mean plasma VEGF concentration before bevacizumab injection was 2.05 +/- 3.00 ng/mL; plasma level decreased significantly to 0.16 +/- 0.10 ng/mL and to 0.14 +/- 0.14 ng/mL (P = 0.028) after 1 week and 2 weeks, respectively. Moreover, the plasma concentrations of VEGF did not return to the original level in any of the samples until 8 weeks after the injection. However, mean plasma IgG1, erythropoietin, insulin growth factor, and PEDF concentrations did not change significantly during the interval between preinjection and any other follow-up time points. Conclusion: Intravitreal bevacizumab injections significantly reduce plasma VEGF concentration in infants with retinopathy of prematurity over a 7-week period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据