4.4 Article

TOPICAL NEPAFENEC IN EYES WITH NONCENTRAL DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000403

关键词

Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network; nepafenac; noncentral DME; topical NSAID

资金

  1. National Eye Institute
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services [EY14231, EY18817, EY023207]
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. Bayer
  5. Genentech, Inc
  6. Novartis Pharma AG
  7. Regeneron
  8. Emmes Corporation through the Office of Research Administration of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a topical, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, nepafenac 0.1%, in eyes with noncentral diabetic macular edema. Methods: Multicenter, double-masked randomized trial. Individuals with good visual acuity and noncentral-involved diabetic macular edema were randomly assigned to nepafenac 0.1% (N = 61) or placebo (nepafenac vehicle, N = 64) 3 times a day for 12 months. The primary outcome was mean change in optical coherence tomography retinal volume at 12 months. Results: Mean baseline retinal volume was 7.8 mm(3). At 12 months, in the nepafenac and placebo groups respectively, mean change in retinal volume was -0.03 mm(3) and -0.02 mm(3) (treatment group difference: -0.02, 95% confidence interval: -0.27 to 0.23, P = 0.89). Central-involved diabetic macular edema was present in 7 eyes (11%) and 9 eyes (14%) at the 12-month visit (P = 0.79), respectively. No differences in visual acuity outcomes were identified. One study participant developed a corneal melt after using nepafenac in the nonstudy eye, which had a history of severe dry eye. No additional safety concerns were evident. Conclusion: In eyes with noncentral diabetic macular edema and good visual acuity, topical nepafenac 0.1% 3 times daily for 1 year likely does not have a meaningful effect on optical coherence tomography-measured retinal thickness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据