4.4 Article

Effect of Co substitution for La on hydrogen storage properties and thermal stabilities of amorphous Mg60Ni30La10-xCox (X=0, 2 and 4) alloys prepared by melt spinning

期刊

MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 176-182

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/1743284713Y.0000000339

关键词

Mg based alloy; Amorphous alloys; Hydrogen storage properties; Thermal stabilities

资金

  1. National Natural Foundations of China [51261003]
  2. Natural Foundations of Guangxi Province [2012GXN-SFGA060002, 2011GXNSFD018004]
  3. Guangxi Experiment Center of Information Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comparison of the hydrogen storage properties and thermal properties of amorphous Mg60Ni30La10-xCox hydrogen storage alloys prepared by melt spinning has been investigated. A, B and C were used to represent each alloy composition when x50, 2 and 4 respectively. Their microstructures, the hydrogen storage properties and the thermal stabilities were analysed by Xray diffraction (XRD), PCTPro2000 and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) respectively. After hydrogenation of Mg60Ni30La10-xCox (A, B and C) samples at 573 K under 2 MPa hydrogen pressure, XRD pattern results indicate the formation of new phases of MgH2 (A, B, C), Mg2NiH4 (A, B, C), La4H12.19 (A, B, C), Mg2Ni0.9Co0.1H4 (B), Mg2NiH0.26 (C) and Mg2CoH2 (C). It is observed that the experimental data of hydrogen desorption kinetics at 523, 573 and 623 K are well fitted through Avrami-Erofeev equation, and the hydrogen desorption kinetics is in the order of C>B>A. In addition, with increasing Co content, alloy C has the maximum hydrogen absorption capacity of 3.05 wt-% and the maximum hydrogen desorption capacity of 2.85 wt-%. Based on the results of DSC analysis, dehydrogenation activation energies of these alloys are determined to be 98.31+/-2.82 kJ mol(-1) (A), 96.33+/-5.61 kJ mol(-1) (B) and 78.99+/-2.98 kJ mol(-1) (C), which are in accordance with the results of hydrogen desorption kinetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据