4.7 Article

Impact of composition on the heat treatment response of additively manufactured 17-4 PH grade stainless steel

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.09.066

关键词

Stainless steel; Precipitation hardening (PH); Additive manufacturing (AM); Nitrogen; Gas atomization; Aging

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research Manufacturing Technology program
  2. Applied Research Laboratory's Institute for Manufacturing and Sustainment Technologies under Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), United States [N00024-12-D-6404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Precipitation hardened (PH) martensitic grade stainless steels are commonly used in additive manufacturing (AM) processes, but the heat treatment response can vary depending upon the powder feedstock composition. As-built AM 17-4 PH grade stainless steel fabricated using argon and nitrogen atomized feedstocks in separate powder bed fusion systems responded differently to standard heat treatment cycles. Materials fabricated from argon atomized feedstocks, containing low levels of nitrogen (0.01 wt%) and retained austenite ( < 1%), responded as expected to standard solutionizing and aging heat treatment cycles. In contrast, materials fabricated from nitrogen atomized feedstocks, containing between 0.06 and 0.12 wt% nitrogen and up to 81% retained austenite, did not display peak aging with standard heat treatments and deviated from the expected overaging response with increasing aging temperatures. At the highest nitrogen and retained austenite levels, peak aging is found to occur at temperatures in excess of 680 degrees C, even though the material still contains retained austenite levels in the 20% range. These unexpected changes in the heat treat response are closely linked to differences in the nitrogen composition of the powder feedstock. Changes in the Ni and Cr equivalent values determined by other primary alloying elements also impact the heat treat response, even though the alloy compositions still fall within standard alloy element composition ranges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据