4.5 Article

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation duty cycle in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

期刊

RESUSCITATION
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 86-90

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.008

关键词

CPR; Duty cycle; Human; Ventricular fibrillation; Resuscitation

资金

  1. Laerdal Foundation
  2. NIH [T32 EB001650]
  3. Philips Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Duty cycle is the portion of time spent in compression relative to total time of the compression-decompression cycle. Guidelines recommend a 50% duty cycle based largely on animal investigation. We undertook a descriptive evaluation of duty cycle in human resuscitation, and whether duty cycle correlates with other CPR measures. Methods: We calculated the duty cycle, compression depth, and compression rate during EMS resuscitation of 164 patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. We captured force recordings from a chest accelerometer to measure ten-second CPR epochs that preceded rhythm analysis. Duty cycle was calculated using two methods. Effective compression time (ECT) is the time from beginning to end of compression divided by total period for that compression-decompression cycle. Area duty cycle (ADC) is the ratio of area under the force curve divided by total area of one compression-decompression cycle. We evaluated the compression depth and compression rate according to duty cycle quartiles. Results: There were 369 ten-second epochs among 164 patients. The median duty cycle was 38.8% (SD = 5.5%) using ECT and 32.2% (SD = 4.3%) using ADC. A relatively shorter compression phase (lower duty cycle) was associated with greater compression depth (test for trend <0.05 for ECT and ADC) and slower compression rate (test for trend <0.05 for ADC). Sixty-one of 164 patients (37%) survived to hospital discharge. Conclusions: Duty cycle was below the 50% recommended guideline, and was associated with compression depth and rate. These findings provider rationale to incorporate duty cycle into research aimed at understanding optimal CPR metrics. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据