4.7 Article

Stacking fault emission from grain boundaries: Material dependencies and grain size effects

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.02.030

关键词

Partial dislocations; Phase field modeling; DFT; Stacking fault

资金

  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program [20130745ECR]
  2. National Nuclear Security Administration of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC52-06NA25396]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When load is applied to fcc nanograins, leading partial dislocations nucleate at grain boundary steps and propagate into the grain, leaving stacking faults behind. The extent to which these faults expand before a trailing partial is emitted generally does not equal the equilibrium separation distance of the corresponding full dislocation. Here we use a density functional theory - phase field dislocation dynamics model to study the effect of applied stress, 3D grain size, material stacking fault energies, and grain boundary ledge size on the stress-driven emission of leading and trailing partial dislocations from a grain boundary. The calculation accounts for the nucleation and glide of leading and trailing partial dislocations by incorporating the entire material gamma-surface into the formulation. We show that the nucleation stress for a Shockley partial from a grain boundary is controlled by the size of the grain boundary ledge, scales with the unstable stacking fault energy gamma(U), and is insensitive to grain size. We also reveal a gigantic gamma-surface effect where small changes in gamma(I)/mu b can lead to large changes in the extent of the stacking fault region. Last, we find that the stacking fault region increases with grain size and eventually saturates at larger grain sizes, which our analyses suggest can be attributed to local grain boundary stresses. These findings can provide insight into transitions in the mechanical behavior of nanostructured metals. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据