4.7 Article

The effect of high strain rate deformation on intermetallic reaction during ultrasonic welding aluminium to magnesium

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.06.055

关键词

Intermetallic compounds; Al12Mg17; Al3Mg2; Reaction kinetics; Ultrasonic welding

资金

  1. EPSRC through LATEST2, Light Alloys towards Environmentally Sustainable Transport [EP/G022402/1]
  2. Friction Joining-Low Energy Manufacturing for Hybrid Structures in Fuel Efficient Transport Applications [EP/G022402/1.JLR]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H020047/1, EP/G022402/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/G022402/1, EP/H020047/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High power ultrasonic spot welding (USW) is a low heat input solid-state joining process that may offer a solution for welding difficult dissimilar-material couples, like magnesium (Mg) to aluminium (Al) for automotive body applications. However, the high strain rate dynamic deformation in USW has been claimed to accelerate inter-diffusion rates in dissimilar joints. The interfacial reaction between Al, AA6111, and Mg AZ31 alloys has been studied as a function of welding energy. For the optimum welding condition of 600J (0.4 s) the reaction layer thickness was already similar to 5 mu m thick. Intermetallic reaction centres were found to nucleate within microwelds at the interface at very short welding times and spread and grow rapidly to form a continuous layer, composed of two sub-layers of Al12Mg17 and Al3Mg2. Interface liquation was also found for longer welding times at temperatures below the recognised lowest eutectic reaction temperature in the Al-Mg binary system. Modelling has been used to show that the solid state reaction kinetics were over twice the rate expected from parabolic growth predictions made using rate constants obtained under static test conditions. The reasons for this discrepancy and the depressed melting reaction are discussed. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据