4.3 Article

The return of ceramic implants: Rose stem inspired dual layered modification of ceramic scaffolds with improved mechanical and anti-infective properties

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.044

关键词

Surface modification; Ceramic implants; 3D printing; Antibacterial activity; Biomedical engineering

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21461015]
  2. Science Foundation of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education [KJLD14010, 20153BCB23035]
  3. major program of Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20161ACB21002]
  4. Foundation of Health and Family Planning Commission of Jiangxi Province [20155246]
  5. Science Foundation Jiangxi Provincial Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine [2013A243]
  6. Foundation of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University [2016YNZJ12007]
  7. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610402]
  8. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [2017KY06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays, traditional ceramics for bone implants have considerably replaced by metal based biomedical materials, attributing to the friability of ceramics. However, ceramic implants possess excellent biocompatibility and longtime abrasion resistance. They should be more desirable for long-term uses of implants in case their fragility had been overcome. In the present work, inspired from natural rose, a dual-layer-modified ceramic scaffold was constructed by coating a superplastic layer of isocyanate (ISO) resin and a nano Zinc Oxide (nano-ZnO) layer on the ceramic scaffold. The ISO resin modification layer with 1 mm thickness, improved the mechanical properties of ceramic implants 2-3 times, and protect the ceramic implants from broken even drop from 1 m high. Moreover, such dual layered modification exhibited broad spectrum antibacterial behavior. In vivo biocompatible studies demonstrated that there was no obvious noticeable tissue damage in all major organs of mice after the implant surgeries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据