4.3 Article

Tuneable hydrogels of Caf1 protein fibers

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.07.063

关键词

Caf1 protein; Hybrid hydrogels; Rheology; Tunable mechanical properties; Tissue engineering

资金

  1. Industrial Biotechnology Catalyst (Innovate UK)
  2. Industrial Biotechnology Catalyst (BBSRC)
  3. Industrial Biotechnology Catalyst (EPSRC)
  4. BBSRC [BB/M018318/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capsular antigen fraction 1 (Caf1) is a robust polymeric protein forming a protective layer around the bacterium Yersinia pestis. Occurring as approximate to 1 mu m polymeric fibers, it shares its immunoglobulin-like fold with the majority of mammalian extracellular proteins such as fibronectin and this structural similarity suggests that this unusual polymer could form useful mimics of the extracellular matrix. Driven by the pressing need for reliable animal free 3D cell culture environments, we showed previously that recombinant Caf1 produced in Escherichia colt can be engineered to include bioactive peptides, which influence cell behavior. Here, we demonstrate that through chemical crosslinking with a small palette of PEG-based crosslinkers, Caf1-based hydrogels can be prepared displaying a wide range of mechanical and morphological properties that were studied by rheology, compressive testing, SDS-PAGE and scanning electron microscopy. By varying the Caf1 protein concentration, viscoelasticity and stiffness (similar to 11-2300 Pa) are reproducibly tunable to match natural and commercial 313 gels. Hydrogel porosity and swelling ratios were found to be defined by crosslinker architecture and concentration. Finally the hydrogels, which are 95-99% water, were shown to retain the high stability of the native Caf1 protein in a range of aqueous conditions, including extended immersion in cell culture media. The unusual Caf1 polymer thus offers the possibility of presenting bioactive protein subunits in a precisely tuneable hydrogel for use in cell culture and drug delivery applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据