4.3 Article

Template-assisted electrohydrodynamic atomization of polycaprolactone for orthopedic patterning applications

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.025

关键词

Polymer; Electrospraying; Template-assisted; Patterning; Orthopedics

资金

  1. University College London (UCL)
  2. JRI Orthopaedics Ltd.
  3. EPSRC [EP/E045839/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E045839/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the development of the novel deposition of biodegradable polycaprolactone (PCL) polymer patterns on a metallic substrate using a jet spraying technique, template-assisted electrohydrodynamic atomization (TAEA), at ambient temperature. The structure of patterns was controlled by systematically varying the polymer concentration (2-15 wt.%) and the flow rate (1-25 mu l min(-1)). Polymer deposition was carried out in the stable cone-jet mode to precisely control the surface structure and morphology. The patterns were studied by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and profilometry, and a high degree of control over the pattern geometry and thickness was achieved by varying the spraying time. The hardness and the effective elastic modulus of the polymer patterns were estimated using nanoindentation. The effect of load, loading rate and the holding time on the hardness and effective elastic modulus was derived. Optimal results were obtained with 5 wt.% PCL in DMAC solution sprayed within the stable cone-jet mode operating window at a flow rate of 15 mu l min(-1) for 300 s at 11.1 kV with a working distance of 60 mm. Hexagonal patterns were well-defined and repeatable with thickness of similar to 34 mu m. The hardness is 1.6 MPa at a loading rate of 0.1 mu N/s and nearly halved when the load rate was increased to 1 mu N/s. The effective elastic modulus of similar to 12 MPa is obtained for a load rate of 0.1 mu N/s. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据