4.6 Article

Defects clustering and ordering in di- and trivalently doped ceria

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 807-812

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.11.073

关键词

oxides; Ceramics; Defects; Crystal structure

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Technology (MEXT), Japan [22310053]
  2. Global Research Center for Environment and Energy based on Nanomaterials Science (GREEN)
  3. National Institute for Materials Science, Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22310053, 25281066] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation and growth of defect clusters in CeO2-M2O3 (M = La3+, Pr3+, Sm3+, Gd3+, Dy3+, Y3+ Yb3+) and CeO2-DO (N = Cd2+, Ca2+, Sr2+, Be2+) binary solid solutions have been comparatively studied by atomistic simulations based on energy minimization of atomic interactions. The calculation ensemble, including both divalent and trivalent dopants, shows a similar energetic tendency for defect species (dopants and associated oxygen vacancies) to aggregate and grow. The dumbbell structure has been verified as a universal vacancy structure in oxygen deficient fluorite lattice. Nevertheless, it also demonstrates different tendencies of dopant-vacancy associations that depend on dopant valence and radius. The dopant is site-selective in trivalent defect clusters correlated with dopant size. While in divalent solid solutions, clusters adopt similar dopant-vacancy locations. Furthermore, all clusters in divalently doped ceria have stronger dopant-vacancy associations/interactions compared to those in trivalent ones. As a consequence, the correlation of the dopant size as well as valence effects on oxygenion conductivity has been illustrated based on an ordered defect cluster model. This study thereby offers insight into the physical picture of ionic conductivity behavior experimentally obtained in aliovalently doped ceria. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据