4.2 Article

Physical Activity as a Predictor of Absence of Frailty in Subjects With Stable COPD and COPD Exacerbation

期刊

RESPIRATORY CARE
卷 61, 期 2, 页码 212-219

出版社

DAEDALUS ENTERPRISES INC
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.04118

关键词

COPD; frailty; physical activity; physical impairment; exacerbation; activity levels

资金

  1. Professional Association of Physiotherapists of Andalusia, Spain (Colegio Profesional de Fisioterapeutas de Andalucia) Grant [SG/0300/13CO]
  2. Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR)
  3. Spanish Foundation of the Lung (Fundacion Respira) (Beca Becario SEPAR) [061/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a key issue in the care of elderly patients. Patients with COPD are more likely to be frail, with a prevalence of 57.8%. Frailty is associated with a low level of physical activity. The aim of this study was to analyze the predictive power and identify the cutoffs of physical activity in their different domains (household, leisure time, and sport) for the absence of frailty in subjects with COPD exacerbation and stable COPD. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The participants underwent an individual interview, including sociodemographic and clinical aspects. The total physical activity and its domains were assessed by the modified Baecke questionnaire, and frailty was measured according to the modified version of Fried. A total of 212 subjects with COPD (104 stable and 108 with COPD exacerbation) were enrolled, along with 100 healthy subjects. RESULTS: The prevalence of frailty was higher in subjects with COPD compared with the control group. An activity level of 3.54 for COPD exacerbation, 3.88 for stable COPD, and 3.50 for healthy subjects assessed using the Baecke questionnaire were recommended as the cutoff points for frailty. Sensitivity and specificity values were 0.95 and 0.807; 0.95 and 0.815; and 0.95 and 0.947, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity level can predict the absence or presence of frailty in subjects with stable and exacerbated COPD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据