4.6 Article

Photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic degradation of aqueous Rhodamine B by low-temperature deposited anatase thin films

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 112, 期 2, 页码 510-515

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.06.009

关键词

Thin films; Semiconductors; Precipitation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [50502029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Well-crystallized anatase thin films with controlled thickness of 0.4-0.8 mu m were deposited on conductive titanium substrates through hydrolysis of titanium tetrafluoride aqueous solution at a low temperature of 60 degrees C for various durations. A comparative study was carried out on their abilities to assist photocatalytic (PC) and photoelectrocatalytic (PEC) degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) in water. The efficiency of the anatase thin film to assist photodegradation of RhB improved significantly with an applied potential of 0.4 V versus SCE, independence of the film thickness and the calcination temperature. The PC degradation rate increased linearly with increasing film thickness to ca. 0.54 mu m, which remained stable with further increasing film thickness. The PEC degradation rate increased dramatically with slightly increasing film thickness from 0.41 to 0.46 mu m, which then decreased with further increasing film thickness. After a subsequent calcination at 500 degrees C, the PC degradation rate reached the optimum value because of the bargaining effect between the increasing crystallinity and increasing grain size with increasing calcination temperatures. The appearance of rutile phase after calcination at temperatures beyond 600 degrees C due to the direct oxidation of the Ti substrate deteriorated additionally the photocatalytic activity. The optimum calcination temperature for the PEC degradation rate was 500-600 degrees C due to the additional effect of increasing conductivity of the anatase film with the increasing calcination temperature. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据