4.7 Article

The use of a directional solidification technique to investigate the interrelationship of thermal parameters, microstructure and microhardness of Bi-Ag solder alloys

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 115-125

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.07.023

关键词

Solidification; Microstructure; Bi-Ag alloys; Microhardness; Solders

资金

  1. FAPESP (Sao Paulo Research Foundation) [2013/13030-5, 2013/08259-3]
  2. CNPq (The Brazilian Research Council)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bi-Ag alloys have been stressed as possible alternatives to replace Pb-based solder alloys. Although acceptable melting temperatures and suitable mechanical properties may characterize such alloys, as referenced in literature, there is a lack of comprehension regarding their microstructures (morphologies and sizes of the phases) considering a composition range from 1.5 to 4.0 wt.%Ag. In order to better comprehend such aspects and their correlations with solidification thermal parameters (growth rate, v and cooling rate, T), directional solidification experiments were carried out under transient heat flow conditions. The effects of Ag content on both cooling rate and growth rate during solidification are examined. Microstructure parameters such as eutectic/dendritic spacing, interphase spacing and diameter of the Ag-rich phase were determined by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The competition between eutectic cells and dendrites in the range from 15 to 4.0 wt.%Ag is explained by the coupled zone concept. Microhardness was determined for different microstructures and alloy Ag contents with a view to permitting correlations with microstructure parameters to be established. Hardness is shown to be directly affected by both solute macrosegregation and morphologies of the phases forming the Bi-Ag alloys, with higher hardness being associated with the cellular morphology of the Bi-2.5 and 4.0 wt.%Ag alloys. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据