4.5 Article

Surface Finish Optimization of Magnesium Pieces Obtained by Dry Turning Based on Taguchi Techniques and Statistical Tests

期刊

MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
卷 26, 期 12, 页码 1503-1510

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2010.544822

关键词

ANOVA; Least Significant Difference test; Magnesium; Optimization; Signal-to-noise; Snedecor's F-test; Surface finish; Taguchi techniques; Turning

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Directorate General of Research) [DPI2008-06771-C04-02]
  2. Industrial Engineering School (UNED) [REF2010-ICF03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnesium is one of the lightest metallic materials and is used in industries such as aeronautics or aerospace because of its excellent weight to resistance ratio. The surface finish is a key quality characteristic in dry turning of magnesium pieces and is often affected by multiple factors within the machining process. Factors such as feed rate, cutting speed, tool coatings, and the interactions among these were investigated in this experimental study. The objectives of this work were to identify the main factors that influence the dry turning of magnesium and to select the optimal manufacturing conditions that result in minimum surface roughness. To achieve these objectives, the smaller-the-better characteristic from the Taguchi method was applied to the average roughness R(a). Using an orthogonal experimental design approach, the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio was used to quantify the amount of variation present in the surface roughness. Then, graphical exploratory data analysis was conducted, and the variability in the S/N ratio of surface roughness was modeled via analysis of variance (ANOVA) fixed-effect analysis and Snedecor's F-tests. This statistical modeling, together with Least Significant Difference testing permitted different combinations of cutting conditions to be classified into two groups: (I) optimal combinations and (II) the remaining combinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据