4.7 Article

Optimization of tribological parameters in abrasive wear mode of carbon-epoxy hybrid composites

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 59, 期 -, 页码 38-49

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.023

关键词

Polymer matrix composites; Scanning electron microscopy; Weighting and ranking; Abrasion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abrasive wear performance of fabric reinforced composites filled with functional fillers is influenced by the properties of the constituents. This work is focused on identifying the factors such as filler type, filler loading, grit size of SiC paper, normal applied load and sliding distance on two-body abrasive wear behaviour of the hybrid composites. Abrasive wear tests were carried on carbon fabric reinforced epoxy composite (C-E) filled with filler alumina (Al2O3) and molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) separately in different proportions, using pin-on-disc apparatus. The experiments were planned according to Taguchi L18 orthogonal array by considering five factors, one at two levels and the remaining at three levels, affecting the abrasion process. Grey relational analysis (GRA) was employed to optimize the tribological parameters having multiple-response. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to determine the significance of factors influencing wear. Also, the comparative specific wear rates of all the composites under dry sliding and two-body abrasive wear were discussed. The analysis showed that the filler loading, grit size and filler type are the most significant factors in controlling the specific wear rate of the C-E composite. Optimal combination of the process parameters for multi performance characteristics of the composite under study is the set with filler type as MoS2, filler loading of 10 wt.%, grit size 320, load of 15 N and sliding distance of 30 m. Further, the optimal parameter setting for minimum specific wear rate, coefficient of friction and maximum hardness were corroborated with the help of scanning electron micrographs. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据