4.7 Article

Tensile and fatigue properties of fiber laser welded high strength low alloy and DP980 dual-phase steel joints

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 43, 期 -, 页码 373-383

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.017

关键词

Fiber laser welding; High strength low alloy steel; Dual-phase steel; Microstructure; Fatigue

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. AUTO21 Network of Centers of Excellence
  3. International Zinc Association (IZA)
  4. Arcelor-Mittal Dofasco
  5. Premier's Research Excellence Award (PREA)
  6. NSERC-Discovery Accelerator Supplement (DAS) Award
  7. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  8. Ryerson Research Chair (RRC) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study was aimed at evaluating the microstructure and mechanical properties of high-speed fiber laser welded high strength low alloy (HSLA) and DP980 dual-phase steel joints with varying weld geometries. Fusion zone (FZ) consisted of martensitic structure, and heat-affected zone (HAZ) contained newly-formed martensite in both steels and partially tempered martensite in DP980. While HAZ-softening was present in DP980, it was absent in HSLA. A distinctive suspension bridge-like hardness profile with the FZ hardness as a pylon appeared in the fiber laser welded joints. Both HSLA and DP980 joints showed a superior tensile strength, with a joint efficiency of 94-96% and 96-97%, respectively, despite a reduced elongation in DP980 joints. Fatigue strength was higher in DP980 joints than in HSLA joints at higher stress amplitudes, but had no obvious difference at lower stress amplitudes. DP980 multiple linear welds exhibited a larger scatter and lower fatigue strength. Fatigue failure of HSLA joints occurred in the base metal at a stress amplitude above 250 MPa, and at weld concavity at a lower stress amplitude below 250 MPa. Fatigue crack in DP980 joints initiated predominantly from the weld concavity at both high and low levels of stress amplitudes. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据