4.7 Article

Effect of nano Al2O3 addition on mechanical properties and wear behavior of NiTi intermetallic

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 375-382

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.099

关键词

NiTi; Nano Al2O3; Phase stability; Nanoindentation; Wear

资金

  1. cooperative research project Development of common manufacturing technology for high functional susceptor [B551179-08-01-00]
  2. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Republic of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been found that the high wear resistance of NiTi alloy is mainly attributed to its pseudoelasticity which is only effective within a small temperature range. It is believed that pseudoelasticity becomes ineffective by applying high-load wear condition which yields plastic deformation and temperature increment during wear test. Therefore, the enhanced wear resistance can be obtained from the improvement of mechanical property of the alloy without much reduction of pseudoelasticity. In this study, a low weight percentage of hard Al2O3 nanoparticles were added to NiTi atomized powders. The resultant powder mixture was homogenized by ball milling and sintered in a vacuum furnace in order to improve the wear property of the composite in comparison with the NiTi alloy. The results demonstrated that the addition of nanoparticles increased the stability of martensite phase. Nanoindentation test results showed that both hardness and elastic modulus were considerably increased in the composite samples in comparison with pure NiTi, while the pseudoelasticity was not significantly reduced. The worn surfaces were investigated using a scanning electron microscope equipped with energy dispersive X-ray. The wear test results confirmed the improved wear performance of NiTi matrix after the addition of nanoparticles under both low and high loads can be mainly attributed to superior mechanical properties combined with pseudoelasticity effect of the composite samples. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据