4.7 Article

Performance assessment of hybrid composite friction materials based on flyash-rock fibre combination

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 723-731

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.009

关键词

Composites; Friction; Fade; Recovery; Wear; Brake pad; Flyash; Lapinus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Friction composites based on several combinations of flyash and inorganic mineral rock fibres such as lapinus (TM) fibre were fabricated, characterised and tribo-evaluated. The tribo-performance in terms of their friction-fade and friction-recovery behaviour has been rigorously evaluated while synchronously taking into account of the in situ braking induced temperature rise in the disc at the braking interface on a Krauss friction testing machine following pulse velocity wave (PVW) 3212 norms as per the Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) regulations. The fade behaviour has been observed to be highly dependent on the combination of flyash-lapinus fibre e.g. fade remained maximum (45%) in the composite with the highest amount of lapinus fibre content and lowest amount of flyash whereas the frictional fluctuations in terms of mu(max)-mu(min) has been observed to be higher in case of low flyash-high lapinus fibre combination. The recovery response seemed unaffected by the disparity of ingredients and remained consistently stable within the range of 112 +/- 2%. The analysis of friction and wear performance has revealed that flyash along with lapinus fibre provide thermo-mechanical stability and overall mechanical integrity to the system causing reduction in friction-fade whereas wear was found to be more recovery-controlled and less fade controlled. Worn surface morphology investigation using SEM has been carried out which has revealed that the interplay of flyash-lapinus combination and topographical attributes vis-a-vis dynamics of contact patches (formation-destruction) largely influence the friction and wear performance of such composites. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据