4.3 Article

Effect of superstimulation protocols on nuclear maturation and distribution of lipid droplets in bovine oocytes

期刊

REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 1137-1146

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/RD13265

关键词

follicle aging; FSH starvation; FSH treatment; lipid droplets; metaphase II; oocyte maturation; superstimulation

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our objective was to study the effect of superstimulation protocols on nuclear maturation of the oocyte and the distribution of lipid droplets in the ooplasm. Heifers (n = 4 each group) during the luteal phase were either treated with FSH for 4 days (Short FSH), FSH for 4 days followed by 84 h of gonadotropin free period (FSH Starvation) or for 7 days (Long FSH) starting from the day of wave emergence. In all groups, LH was given 24 h after induced luteolysis (penultimate day of FSH) and cumulus-oocyte complexes were collected 24 h later. Oocytes were stained for nuclear maturation (Lamin/chromatin) and lipid droplets (Nile red). The Long FSH group had a greater proportion of mature oocytes (metaphase II) compared with heifers in the Short FSH and FSH Starvation groups (59/100 vs 5/23 and 2/25, respectively; P < 0.01). On average across all groups, oocytes contained 22 pL of lipids (3.3% of ooplasm volume) distributed as 3000 droplets. Average volume of individual lipid droplets was higher in the FSH Starvation (11.5 +/- 1.5 10(-3) pL, P = 0.03) compared with the Short and Long FSH groups (7.2 +/- 0.6 10(-3) and 8.0 +/- 0.8 10(-3) pL, respectively). In conclusion, both FSH Starvation and Short FSH treatments yielded a lower proportion of mature oocytes compared with the Long FSH treatment. Furthermore, FSH starvation led to an accumulation of larger lipid droplets in the ooplasm, indicating atresia. Our results indicate that a longer superstimulation period in beef cattle yields higher numbers and better-quality oocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据