4.1 Article

Gray Seal Behavior in a Fish Weir Observed Using Dual-Frequency Identification Sonar

期刊

MARINE TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY JOURNAL
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 72-78

出版社

MARINE TECHNOLOGY SOC INC
DOI: 10.4031/MTSJ.48.4.2

关键词

depredation; fishing gear; fisheries interaction; DIDSON; underwater imagery; gray seal

资金

  1. Massachusetts Marine Fisheries Institute
  2. Quebec-Labrador Foundation Sounds Conservancy Grants Program
  3. Marine Technology Society
  4. Friends of Chatham Waterways
  5. Eldredge familyEldredge family
  6. Craig Poosikian
  7. Jon Loehrke
  8. Kevin Stokesbury
  9. School for Marine Science and Technology (SMAST) Department of Fisheries Oceanography
  10. Ed Belcher and Bill Hanot of Sound Metrics Corp
  11. University of British Columbia Marine Mammal Research Unit
  12. Amber Creamer (Dalhousie University)
  13. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Marine Mammal Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Marine mammal depredation can have significant negative effects on the performance of fixed fishing gears. Gray seals (Halichoerus grypus) have been observed feeding on fish weir catches in Nantucket sound, and remnants of longfin inshore squid (Doryteuthis pealeii) and finfish in the nets are attributable to seal depredation. A dual-frequency identification sonar (DIDSON) deployed in a weir to monitor squid and fish occurrence captured observations of seal presence and behavior. Continuous recordings of 24+h were subsampled at multiple intervals to optimize the likelihood of seal detection while minimizing processing time. Targets detected and identified to species included squid, bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix), and gray seals. Seal occurence in the weir was observed primarily at night. The presence and behavior of seals may negatively affect the efficiency of the weir due to disruption of the passage of schooling squid and finfish into the catch chamber, Behavioral observations collected using DIDSON can aid in the design of fishing gear modifications to reduce seal depredation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据