4.5 Article

Architecture, development and geological control of the Xisha carbonate platforms, northwestern South China Sea

期刊

MARINE GEOLOGY
卷 350, 期 -, 页码 71-83

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2013.12.016

关键词

carbonate platform; reef; eustasy; tectonic control; post-rift; South China Sea

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Program of the Ministry of Sciences and Technology, China [2009CB219406]
  2. Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX3-SW-229]
  3. National Scientific Foundation of China [91228208, 40930845]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Newly acquired seismic data allow improved understanding of the architecture and evolution of isolated carbonate platforms on the continental slope of the northern South China Sea. The Xisha carbonate platforms were initiated on a basement high, the Xisha Uplift, in the early Miocene and have remained active up to the present. Their distribution is limited to pre-existing localized, fault-bounded blocks within the Xisha Uplift so individual platforms were small in size at the beginning of the Miocene. However, during the middle Miocene, the platform carbonate factories flourished across an extensive area with 55,900 km(2). The platforms began to backstep in response to a relative sea-level rise in the late Miocene. Platform-edge reefs, patch reefs, pinnacle reefs, atoll reefs and horseshoe reefs, all developed on various platforms. The distribution of platform carbonates shrank significantly during Pliocene-Quaternary time to isolated carbonate platforms, represented today by Xuande Atoll and Yongle Atoll. Tectonics and eustasy were the two main controls on platform development. Tectonics controlled both the initial topography for reef growth and the distribution of platforms, including those that survived the drowning event associated with the late Miocene rapid relative sea-level rise. Eustasy controlled high-frequency carbonate sequence development Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据