4.3 Article

A Simplification of Ria Coastline with Geomorphologic Characteristics Preserved

期刊

MARINE GEODESY
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 167-186

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2014.903215

关键词

map generalization; ria coastline; coastline simplification; Delaunay triangulation

资金

  1. National High-Tech Research and Development Plan of China [2012AA12A404, 2012BAJ22B02-01]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301410]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M531742]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To meet the requirements of multi-scale mapping in maritime applications, marine charts need to be produced at various levels of detail (LOD) using map generalization. As a prominent geographic feature, the coastline has to be generalized considering the geomorphologic characteristics rather than from a pure geometric perspective. Morphologic and domain-specific constraints (e.g., safety) should be incorporated in designing a coastline generalization algorithm. Motivated by the generalization of ria coastlines, this article proposes a simplification algorithm that is specific to coastlines. An analysis of ria coasts results in several morphologic constraints that have to be satisfied in coastline generalization, such as the dendritic pattern of estuaries. To satisfy these constraints, a hierarchical estuary tree model is first established by Delaunay triangulation, which helps to represent the dendritic pattern of ria coastlines. Minor estuaries are then deleted to achieve a reasonable coastline simplification. To imitate manual generalization, an indicator is designed to calculate the importance of estuaries in a context dependent manner. By comparing with a well-known bend simply algorithm, we show that the presented method can maintain dendritic pattern of coastline and is free from self-intersection and also granted for navigation safety. This article also demonstrates that the proposed approach is applicable to coastlines in general.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据