4.7 Article

The effect of temperature and compression during pyrolysis on the density of charcoal made from Australian eucalypt wood

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 471-478

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.02.013

关键词

Pyrolysis; Biomass; Compression; Charcoal; Density; Temperature

资金

  1. BlueScope Steel Ltd.
  2. Arrium Ltd.
  3. CSIRO Minerals Down Under Flagship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Charcoal produced from sustainably grown biomass can be used to reduce the net CO2 emissions from iron and steel making operations. However careful control of pyrolysis conditions is required to produce charcoal with the necessary properties to optimise substitution for coal and coke in specific applications. The density of charcoal is an important property to control in order to minimise transport and handling costs as well as control of charcoal reactivity and strength. In this work the density of charcoal has been increased through compression of Blackbutt wood chips during pyrolysis. The true density of charcoal prepared under compression of 0.5 MPa and at a heating rate of 2 degrees C/min was found to increase with pyrolysis temperature, especially at temperatures higher than 450 degrees C. This increase in true density is likely to be due to restructuring of the graphitic structure at high temperatures. The true density of charcoal was found to be independent of compressive pressure during pyrolysis (0.056-4.0 MPa). The porosity of charcoal increased linearly with pyrolysis temperature and ranged from 0.24 at 300 degrees C to about 0.46 at 700 degrees C. The apparent density of charcoal prepared under a compressive pressure of 0.5 MPa was about 1000 kg/m(3) and had minimum between 400 and 600 degrees C. This is similar to the apparent density of metallurgical coke. The results suggest that specially prepared charcoal could be a viable substitute for coal and coke in steelmaking applications which require a dense carbon product. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据