4.2 Article

Seabird diet indicates changing Arctic marine communities in eastern Canada

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 454, 期 -, 页码 171-+

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps09299

关键词

Seabird; Arctic; Climate change; Diet shift; Fish community; Zooplankton; Thick-billed murre; Uria lomvia; Sea ice cover

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC
  3. Environment Canada
  4. Natural Resources Canada
  5. Nattivak Hunters' and Trappers' Organization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changing climatic conditions are affecting ecosystems worldwide, but polar ecosystems are experiencing the most rapid changes as the extent of summer sea ice has diminished over the last several decades. In the Canadian Arctic, thick-billed murres Uria lomvia can be used as samplers of the marine environment, and we examined changes in the diet of the birds between recent and historical studies from the 1970s and 1980s. In the low Arctic, the amount of Arctic cod, an ice-dependent species, declined in the murre diet; and capelin, a subarctic species, has now become the primary prey item. In the mid-Arctic, where summer sea ice is still present during the summer, Arctic cod persists as an important prey item, but capelin is now regularly observed, marking an apparent northward expansion of this species over the last 30 yr. In the high Arctic, summer sea ice continues to dominate the seascape in most years, and Arctic cod continues to dominate the diets of the murres. Changes in Arctic cod in the bird diet were found to be more related to sea ice conditions averaged over multiple years rather than single-year indices, indicating that long-term changes in sea ice do impact this prey species. The diversity of the prey sampled by the birds has decreased, signaling a potential change in the number of prey species available. Overall, the birds illustrate changes occurring in the marine environment in areas where little other information is available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据