4.2 Article

Simplifying the complex: an 'Ecosystem Principles Approach' to goods and services management in marine coastal ecosystems

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 434, 期 -, 页码 291-301

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps09118

关键词

Complexity; Ecosystem-based management; Ecosystem functions; Ecosystem processes; Fundamental principles; Goods and services; Millennium Assessment

资金

  1. FRST [C01X0501]
  2. Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland (MASTS) Coastal Zone Joint Research Theme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to manage complex systems effectively must stem from simplifications of ecological knowledge. We present a technique called the 'Ecosystem Principles Approach' (EPA) as a progressive way of incorporating ecology into goods and services assessments. The EPA moves away from the complexity of ecosystem functions and focuses on general ecological principles. These principles more explicitly define key elements of system functioning, are not spatially or temporally confined, and can be utilised in assessment and decision-making processes. When applied to a coastal system in New Zealand, the EPA highlighted that services were primarily dependent on connectivity and that the maintenance of healthy intertidal areas was highly important for system functioning. The approach also demonstrated a separation between locations where ecosystem functions were generated and where services were valued. A high level of multi-functionality and connectivity between goods and services in marine coastal systems suggests services should be managed collectively rather than individually. The strength of the EPA is that it aligns to the principles of 'Ecosystem-Based Management'. This approach demonstrates how ecological information can be simplified into a format that can advise policy and better integrate with management. It highlights the need for greater trans-disciplinary integration of ecology and social science to better understand how human interactions result in critical community shifts and loss of resilience.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据