4.2 Article

Genetic evidence for sex-specific migratory behaviour in western South Pacific humpback whales

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 398, 期 -, 页码 275-286

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps08280

关键词

Cetacea; Control region; GAMOVA; Breeding grounds; mtDNA

资金

  1. IDP-Australia
  2. University of New South Wales
  3. Environment Australia [RSP_MS96-01]
  4. Sea World Research and Rescue Foundation Inc.
  5. Dept. of Veterinary Anatomy and Pathology, The University of Sydney

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although predictable in its areas of occurrence, many aspects of humpback whale migration are still poorly understood. Nuclear DNA analysis has revealed a low level of relatedness among whales using the same migratory corridor, and has shown that closely related individuals tend not to travel in spatial association. Yet it still remains uncertain whether whales from different matrilineally discrete feeding stocks travel along the same migratory corridor for later mixing in common breeding waters. The western and central South Pacific Ocean is the only ocean basin where thousands of islands and reefs occur as suitable wintering habitat for humpback whales, so here their migratory behaviour may not be constrained by habitat. We analysed sex-specific and temporal distributions of 42 mitochondrial haplotypes detected in 135 humpback whales sampled off eastern Australia throughout 1 annual migration. A noticeable difference was found in haplotypic composition between northbound males and females, suggesting that the 2 sexes of any single matrilineal stock might select different and only partially overlapping migratory routes. We hypothesise that males most closely related to the N-S migrating females off eastern Australia migrate north elsewhere, perhaps past New Zealand. These findings suggest that longitudinal movements by male humpback whales are probably more extensive than currently thought, and indicate the need for reexamination of genetic data from humpback whales in the South Pacific, disaggregated by gender.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据