4.2 Article

Exploring movement patterns of an exploited coral reef fish when tagging data are limited

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 405, 期 -, 页码 87-99

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps08527

关键词

Movement; Coral reef fish; Lethrinus miniatus; Great Barrier Reef; Modelling; Migration; Fisheries

资金

  1. Cooperative Research Centre for the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (CRC Reef)
  2. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation
  3. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
  4. Australian Postgraduate Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Movement is one of the most fundamental demographic variables affecting the distribution and abundance of populations, but movement patterns for exploited populations of coral reef fish have not been studied extensively. Obtaining movement data for many species by means of traditional tagging methods can be difficult because of high tagging-induced mortality and low recapture rates. We used an age-structured population dynamics model parameterised using data from different regions to explore potential movement patterns for the red throat emperor Lethrinus miniatus, an exploited coral reef fish species for which traditional tagging studies have been unsuccessful. The model used a Gaussian function to describe the proportion of fish of a given age moving to or from 1 of 3 regions (Townsville, Mackay and Storm Cay) of the Great Barrier Reef. The model was fitted with and without movement to empirical age frequency data from each region over a 5 yr period (1995 to 1999). Including movement in the model led to significantly better fits to the data and revealed discrete movement patterns within each region. The model predicted net immigration to the Townsville region and net emigration from the Mackay and Storm Cay regions. We present alternative hypotheses about migration patterns of L. miniatus and highlight the importance of determining the scales at which movement in larger, exploited coral reef fishes occurs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据