4.2 Article

Top-down effects on intertidal mussel populations: assessing two predator guilds in a South African marine protected area

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 411, 期 -, 页码 149-159

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps08681

关键词

Intertidal; Mussels; Predator exclusion experiment; South Africa; Marine protected areas; MPA; Top-down regulation

资金

  1. South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology
  2. National Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mussels are important ecological engineers and occupiers of intertidal space in many parts of the world, where their populations are shaped by top-down regulation through predation on adults. In South Africa, adult predation is believed to be low, with mussel populations limited by competition or bottom-up supply of recruits. We tested the hypothesis that predation shapes these populations at the recruit rather than the adult stage by measuring predation on recruits at 2 rocky shores 100 m apart in a marine reserve, with no-take regulations. To explore the role of different guilds of predators, we used 7 treatments (fences, roofs, cages plus appropriate controls) to discriminate between the effects of benthic and pelagic predators. Factorial ANOVA showed that both types of predation had strong effects. Juvenile mussels were quickly removed in treatments with a roof (which excluded pelagic predators), a fence (which excluded benthic predators), and unprotected controls exposed to all predators. Treatments that excluded only one guild of predators were significantly different from the full cage, but not different from each other or the fully exposed control treatment. Thus, benthic and pelagic predators had similar effects that were not significantly different, suggesting that interference may occur between predator guilds. Under experimental conditions, the combined pressure of benthic and pelagic predators resulted in high mortality that may have top-down effects on mussel populations through recruit rather than adult predation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据