4.2 Article

Long-term changes in temperate Australian coastal waters: implications for phytoplankton

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 394, 期 -, 页码 1-19

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps08297

关键词

Salinity; Temperature; Chlorophyll a; Nutrients; Climate change; Stratification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A similar to 60 yr physical and chemical data set from 4 coastal stations around Australia plus remotely sensed SeaWiFS and phytoplankton taxonomic data were used to evaluate the temporal and spatial variation in phytoplankton ecology. The most consistent trend observed at all stations was a long-term increase in surface salinity of similar to 0.003 +/- 0.0008 psu yr(-1). All stations showed positive trends in temperature, with the fastest surface warming (0.0202 degrees C yr(-1) over 60 yr) in the western Tasman Sea. Long-term trends in warming and stratification were more evident in some months and were not well characterized by annual averages. There was no general pattern of increasing stratification (0 to 50 m); only some stations and a few months showed significant changes. Long-term trends in surface nitrate and phosphate concentrations were either not significant (3 instances) or positive (5 instances) and were up to 6.1 nM phosphate yr(-1). A pronounced decline in silicate was evident at the 3 east coast stations, with concentrations falling by as much as 58 nM yr(-1) over the last similar to 30 yr. The western Tasman Sea experienced a similar to 50% decline in the growth rate and biomass of the spring bloom from 1997 to 2007, while other sites showed significant temporal variability in chlorophyll a that was associated with the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI). Diatoms tended to dominate the microplankton, especially during periods of low stratification. In conclusion, the physical, chemical and biological properties of Australian temperate waters have changed considerably over the last 60 yr in response to variation in the SOI and the strengthening East Australian Current.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据