4.2 Article

Increased vulnerability of Zostera noltii to stress caused by low light and elevated ammonium levels under phosphate deficiency

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 365, 期 -, 页码 67-75

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps07512

关键词

ammonium toxicity; carbohydrates; eutrophication; fluorescence; net production; phosphate limitation; seagrass

资金

  1. Marie Curie fellowship [MEIF-CT-2005-515071]
  2. European Reintegration Grant [MERG-CT-2007-205675]
  3. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia
  4. Spanish Project [CTM2005-00395/MAR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of light and ammonium levels on net production, fluorescence parameters and non-structural carbohydrates of the seagrass Zostera noltii under different phosphate conditions were studied. A fully factorial design was used with light (low/high levels), ammonium supply and phosphate preculture conditions of the plants as the experimental variables. Both ammonium supply and low light caused negative and synergistic effects on net production, while ammonium toxicity was more severe at high light levels; in this case, it was independent of the non-structural carbohydrate (sucrose and starch) content. Preculturing of plant with added phosphate alleviated the ammonium toxicity, and also attenuated the negative production balance of plants grown at low light levels. The results indicated that phosphate preculture ameliorated the plant's short-term response against the assayed stressors (low light, high ammonium) significantly. An overall consumption of non-structural carbohydrates in response to environmental stressors was recorded throughout the experiment, indicating the importance of carbon and phosphorus reserves to cope with adverse conditions. ln addition, phosphate deficiency increased the vulnerability of plants, which could have negative ecological consequences for seagrass species thriving under phosphate deficiency conditions, or in developing seagrass transplantation programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据