4.7 Review

Marketed Marine Natural Products in the Pharmaceutical and Cosmeceutical Industries: Tips for Success

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 1066-1101

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md12021066

关键词

marine natural products; pharmaceuticals; cosmeceuticals; biodiscovery; challenges; success; market

资金

  1. Portuguese government [FCT/SFRH/BI/51091, PTDC/QUI-QUI/098053/2008]
  2. QREN SI IDT [13107LUSOEXTRACT 2010]
  3. European Union [KBBE-2012-6-311975-MaCuMBA, KBBE-2012-6-311848-Bluegenics]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/QUI-QUI/098053/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The marine environment harbors a number of macro and micro organisms that have developed unique metabolic abilities to ensure their survival in diverse and hostile habitats, resulting in the biosynthesis of an array of secondary metabolites with specific activities. Several of these metabolites are high-value commercial products for the pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical industries. The aim of this review is to outline the paths of marine natural products discovery and development, with a special focus on the compounds that successfully reached the market and particularly looking at the approaches tackled by the pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies that succeeded in marketing those products. The main challenges faced during marine bioactives discovery and development programs were analyzed and grouped in three categories: biodiversity (accessibility to marine resources and efficient screening), supply and technical (sustainable production of the bioactives and knowledge of the mechanism of action) and market (processes, costs, partnerships and marketing). Tips to surpass these challenges are given in order to improve the market entry success rates of highly promising marine bioactives in the current pipelines, highlighting what can be learned from the successful and unsuccessful stories that can be applied to novel and/or ongoing marine natural products discovery and development programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据