4.8 Review

The decomposition of energy-related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 1255-1266

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.021

关键词

Carbon emissions; Carbon emission intensity; LMDI; Decoupling index

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71001008, 71273028, 71322103, 71431008]
  2. Basic Research Fund of Beijing Institute of Technology [20122142008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to find the efficient ways to reduce carbon emission intensity in China, we utilize the LMDI method to decompose the changes of China's carbon emissions and carbon emission intensity from 1996 to 2010, from the perspectives of energy sources and industrial structure respectively. Then we introduce the decoupling index to analyze the decoupling relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth in China. The results indicate that, on the one hand, economic growth appeared as the main driver of carbon emissions increase in the past decades, while the decrease of energy intensity and the cleaning of final energy consumption structure played significant roles in curbing carbon emissions; meanwhile, the secondary industry proved the principal source of carbon emissions reduction among the three industries and had relatively higher potential. On the other hand, when the decoupling relationship is considered, most years during the study period saw the relative decoupling effect between carbon emissions and economic growth, which indicated that the reduction effect of inhibiting factors of carbon emissions was less than the driving effect of economic growth, and the economy grew with increased carbon emissions; there appeared the absolute decoupling effect in 1997, 2000 and 2001, which implied that the economy grew while carbon emissions decreased; whereas no decoupling effect was identified in 2003 and 2004. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据