4.7 Article

Three New and Eleven Known Unusual C25 Steroids: Activated Production of Silent Metabolites in a Marine-Derived Fungus by Chemical Mutagenesis Strategy using Diethyl Sulphate

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 1545-1568

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md12031545

关键词

Penicillium purpurogenum; 23-O-methylantineocyclocitrinol; marine-derived fungus; dimolybdenum tetracetate; antineocyclocitrinol; structure determination; DES mutagenesis; Mo2-induced CD; C25 steroids

资金

  1. NSFC [30973631, 81172976]
  2. NHTRDP [2013AA092901, 2007AA09Z411]
  3. NSTMP [2012ZX09301-003, 2009ZX09103-019, 2009ZX09301-002]
  4. CAS [KSCX2-EW-G-6]
  5. COMRA [DYXM-115-02-2-09]
  6. AMMS, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three new (1-3) and 11 known (4-14) C25 steroids with an unusual bicyclo[4.4.1]A/B ring system were isolated by tracing newly produced metabolites in the EtOAc extract of an antitumor mutant AD-1-2 obtained by the diethyl sulphate (DES) mutagenesis of a marine-derived Penicillium purpurogenum G59. HPLC-PDAD-UV and HPLC-ESI-MS analyses indicated that the G59 strain did not produce these metabolites and the production of 1-14 in the mutant AD-1-2 extract was caused by the activation of silent metabolites in the original G59 strain by DES mutagenesis. The structures of the new compounds, named antineocyclocitrinols A (1) and B (2) and 23-O-methylantineocyclocitrinol (3), including their absolute configurations were determined by various spectroscopic methods, especially the NMR and Mo-2-induced CD analyses. Compounds 1-3 provide the first examples of the C25 bicyclo[4.4.1]A/B ring steroids with the Z-configuration of 20,22-double bond. All of 1-14 weakly inhibited several human cancer cell lines to varying extents. These results provided additional examples for the successful application of the chemical mutagenesis strategy using DES to discover new compounds by activating silent metabolites in fungal isolates and supported also the effectiveness and usefulness of this new strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据