4.7 Article

Simple and Rapid Quality Control of Sulfated Glycans by a Fluorescence Sensor Assay-Exemplarily Developed for the Sulfated Polysaccharides from Red Algae Delesseria sanguinea

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 2205-2227

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md12042205

关键词

Delesseria sanguinea; sulfated polysaccharides; quality control; fluorescence sensor; (red) algae; biopolymer; assay development; Polymer-H; sulfated glycan; fondaparinux

资金

  1. European Fishery Fund (EFF) of the European Union
  2. Ministry of Agriculture, Environment and Consumer Protection Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfated polysaccharides (SP) from algae are of great interest due to their manifold biological activities. Obstacles to commercial (especially medical) application include considerable variability and complex chemical composition making the analysis and the quality control challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate a simple microplate assay for screening the quality of SP. It is based on the fluorescence intensity (FI) increase of the sensor molecule Polymer-H by SP and was originally developed for direct quantification of SP. Exemplarily, 65 SP batches isolated from the red alga Delesseria sanguinea (D.s.-SP) and several other algae polysaccharides were investigated. Their FI increase in the Polymer-H assay was compared with other analytical parameters. By testing just one concentration of a D.s.-SP sample, quality deviations from the reference D.s.-SP and thus both batch-to-batch variability and stability can be detected. Further, structurally distinct SP showed to differ in their concentration-dependent FI profiles. By using corresponding reference compounds, the Polymer-H assay is therefore applicable as identification assay with high negative predictability. In conclusion, the Polymer-H assay showed to represent not only a simple method for quantification, but also for characterization identification and differentiation of SP of marine origin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据