4.7 Article

Marine Natural Products Acting on the Acetylcholine-Binding Protein and Nicotinic Receptors: From Computer Modeling to Binding Studies and Electrophysiology

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 1859-1875

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md12041859

关键词

marine natural compounds; acetylcholine-binding protein; nicotinic acetylcholine receptors; computer modeling; radioligand assay; electrophysiology

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [12-04-01746-a, 13-04-40377-H]
  2. program of the Russian Academy of Sciences Molecular and cellular biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For a small library of natural products from marine sponges and ascidians, in silico docking to the Lymnaea stagnalis acetylcholine-binding protein (AChBP), a model for the ligand-binding domains of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), was carried out and the possibility of complex formation was revealed. It was further experimentally confirmed via competition with radioiodinated -bungarotoxin ([I-125]-Bgt) for binding to AChBP of the majority of analyzed compounds. Alkaloids pibocin, varacin and makaluvamines C and G had relatively high affinities (K-i 0.5-1.3 M). With the muscle-type nAChR from Torpedo californica ray and human neuronal 7 nAChR, heterologously expressed in the GH(4)C(1) cell line, no competition with [I-125]-Bgt was detected in four compounds, while the rest showed an inhibition. Makaluvamines (K-i similar to 1.5 M) were the most active compounds, but only makaluvamine G and crambescidine 359 revealed a weak selectivity towards muscle-type nAChR. Rhizochalin, aglycone of rhizochalin, pibocin, makaluvamine G, monanchocidin, crambescidine 359 and aaptamine showed inhibitory activities in electrophysiology experiments on the mouse muscle and human 7 nAChRs, expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Thus, our results confirm the utility of the modeling studies on AChBPs in a search for natural compounds with cholinergic activity and demonstrate the presence of the latter in the analyzed marine biological sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据