4.7 Article

Influence of Lipid A Acylation Pattern on Membrane Permeability and Innate Immune Stimulation

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 3197-3208

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/md11093197

关键词

endotoxin; lipid A; lipopolysaccharide; TLR4; MD2; membrane permeability; PagL

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2012CB725202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170069]
  3. Program of SKLF [SKLF-ZZB-201301]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSPR1030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipid A, the hydrophobic anchor of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), is an essential component in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. It can stimulate the innate immune system via Toll-like receptor 4/myeloid differentiation factor 2 (TLR4/MD2), leading to the release of inflammatory cytokines. In this study, six Escherichia coli strains which can produce lipid A with different acylation patterns were constructed; the influence of lipid A acylation pattern on the membrane permeability and innate immune stimulation has been systematically investigated. The lipid A species were isolated and identified by matrix assisted laser ionization desorption-time of flight/tandem mass spectrometry. N-Phenyl naphthylamine uptake assay and antibiotic susceptibility test showed that membrane permeability of these strains were different. The lower the number of acyl chains in lipid A, the stronger the membrane permeability. LPS purified from these strains were used to stimulate human or mouse macrophage cells, and different levels of cytokines were induced. Compared with wild type hexa-acylated LPS, penta-acylated, tetra-acylated and tri-acylated LPS induced lower levels of cytokines. These results suggest that the lipid A acylation pattern influences both the bacterial membrane permeability and innate immune stimulation. The results would be useful for redesigning the bacterial membrane structure and for developing lipid A vaccine adjuvant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据