4.6 Article

Identification and Characterization of an Extracellular Alkaline Phosphatase in the Marine Diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum

期刊

MARINE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 425-436

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10126-013-9494-3

关键词

Alkaline phosphatase; Diatom; Glycoprotein; Metal ion; PhoA

资金

  1. National Science Council (Taipei, Taiwan) [NSC 101-2313-B-019-006, NSC 99-2313-B-019-010-MY3, NSC 100-2627-B-019-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In phosphorus-deficient conditions, Phaeodactylum tricornutum releases an alkaline phosphatase (PtAPase) to the medium that is readily detectable by activity staining. Nucleic acid and amino acid sequence of this alkaline phosphatase (APase) was identified by performing proteomic analysis and database searches. Sequence alignment suggests that PtAPase belongs to the PhoA family, and it possesses key residues at the Escherichia coli PhoA active site. Quantitative PCR results indicate that the induction of APase mRNA transcription is very sensitive to phosphorus availability and population growth. The molecular mass of native PtAPase (148 kDa) determined by gel filtration chromatography indicates that PtAPase, like most PhoA, is homodimeric. Zn and Mg ions are essential cofactors for most PhoA enzymes; however, PtAPase activity did not require Zn ions. In fact, 5 mM Zn2+, Mo2+, Co2+, Cd2+, or Cu2+ inhibited its enzymatic activity, whereas 5 mM Mn2+, Mg2+, or Ca2+ enhanced its enzymatic activity. The responses of PtAPase to divalent metal ions were different from those of most PhoAs, but were similar to the PhoA in a marine bacterium, Cobetia marina. Phylogenetic analysis shows that homologs of PhoA are also present in other diatom species, and that they clustered in a unique branch away from other PhoA members. PtAPase may represent a novel class of PhoA that helps diatoms to survive in the ocean. Quantification of the PtAPase mRNA may help monitor the physiological condition of diatoms in natural environments and artificial bioreactors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据