4.4 Article

Constancy and change in marine predator diets across a shift in oceanographic conditions in the Northern California Current

期刊

MARINE BIOLOGY
卷 161, 期 4, 页码 837-851

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-013-2384-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bureau of Land Management
  2. US Fish and Wildlife Service
  3. Mamie Markham Graduate Research Fellowship
  4. Oregon Sea Grant's Robert E. Malouf Marine Science Fellowship
  5. National Science Foundation's Research Experience for Undergraduates program
  6. Oregon State University's Office of Sponsored Programs
  7. William Q. Wick Marine Fisheries award
  8. Lillian B. Reynolds award
  9. Oregon Laurels scholarship
  10. Lottery graduate scholarship
  11. Northwest Scientific Association
  12. Directorate For Geosciences
  13. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1263349] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  14. Directorate For Geosciences
  15. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1004947] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Variable ocean conditions can greatly impact prey assemblages and predator foraging in marine ecosystems. Our goal was to better understand how a change in ocean conditions influenced dietary niche overlap among a suite of midtrophic-level predators. We examined the diets of three fishes and one seabird off central Oregon during two boreal summer upwelling periods with contrasting El Nio (2010) and La Nia (2011) conditions. We found greater niche specialization during El Nio and increased niche overlap during La Nia in both the nekton and micronekton diet components, especially in the larger, more offshore predators. However, only the two smaller, more nearshore predators exhibited interannual variation in diet composition. Concurrent trawl surveys confirmed that changes in components of predator diets reflected changes in the prey community. Using multiple predators across diverse taxa and life histories provided a comprehensive understanding of food-web dynamics during changing ocean conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据