4.8 Review

Biocathode in microbial electrolysis cell; present status and future prospects

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 23-33

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.003

关键词

MEC; Biocathode; Hydrogen production

资金

  1. Sciencefund from Malaysian Ministry of Science, Technology Innovation [03-01-02-SF0985]
  2. Dana Impak Penebitan from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia [DIP-2012-27]
  3. Exploratory Research Grant Scheme from Malaysian Ministry of Education [ERGS/1/2012/TK05/UKM/01/2]
  4. Hexagon Synergy (M) Sdn Bhd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of the biocathode for hydrogen production in a Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC) is a promising alternative to precious metal catalysts. However, biocathodes are still in the improvement and development stages and require a deep understanding of the bioelectrochemical mechanisms involved. In this review, the results of biocathode MEC experiments and studies in the literature on biocathode development methods were summarised; furthermore, used carbon sources and substrates in biocathodic compartments and microbial communities on the biocathode were characterised. Based on the respective articles that were examined, biocathode MEC may be developed and initiated in one of three categories: (I) half biological two-chambered biocathode MEC; (II) full biological two-chambered biocathode MEC; (III) full biological single-chambered biocathode MEC. In addition, various mixed cultures capable of producing hydrogen were identified, and predominant species were detected. Desulfovibrio paquesii, Desulfovibrio G11 and Geobacter sulfurreducens were also successfully tested as pure cultures in biocathode MECs. Further studies are necessary for an acute and experimental comprehension of the transfer of electrons and the energy conservation mechanism involved in the biocathode MEC, which may provide a cost-effective and practical implementation of this technology. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据