4.4 Article

Alimentary niche partitioning in the Galapagos sea lion, Zalophus wollebaeki

期刊

MARINE BIOLOGY
卷 157, 期 12, 页码 2769-2781

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-010-1535-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) [SEP-2004-C01-46806]
  2. Servicio de Relaciones Exteriores de Mexico (SRE)
  3. CICIMAR of the Instituto Politecnico Nacional

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sea lions are generally considered opportunistic feeders. However, studies from different areas suggest their diet consists mostly of four to five types of prey. Previous studies in Galapagos sea lions have identified at least three feeding strategies for this species, suggesting diversification of their diet. Diet diversification is favored in organisms with relatively high trophic position and subject to high intra-specific and low inter-specific competition. Zalophus wollebaeki meet these criteria as the only pinniped on San Cristobal Island, where three sea lion rookeries are located within 11 km: a distance considerably shorter than their 41 km foraging range. To measure the degree of diet diversification, we used scats and stable isotope analyses. A total of 270 scat samples from lactating females and 142 fur samples from sea lion pups were collected during the breeding season 2006. The scat analysis identified distinct diets among rookeries, with minimal trophic overlap (C lambda = 0.19), a trophic level TL = 4.5 (secondary-tertiary carnivore), and trophic breadth of a specialist predator (B (i) = 0.37). The mean delta N-15 and delta C-13 values were 13.07 +/- A 0.52 and -16.34 +/- A 0.37, respectively. No significant difference was found in the delta N-15 values from the sea lion rookeries, but differences were found inter- and intra-population in delta C-13 values for pups from different groups (ANOVA P < 0.05). Our results indicate that diet diversification is present in the Galapagos sea lion and may play important role to the survival of the species in a habitat where pinniped populations are limited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据